Subject: RE: EnergyOne
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:36:00 -0700 (PDT)

Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/29/2001 05:31 PM
		 
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sylvia S Pollan/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: RE: EnergyOne

Do you have a redline version of our initial contract to them?  I never saw 
my comments included in a draft...  

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hyvl, Dan  
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Reves, Brant
Cc: Pollan, Sylvia S.
Subject: EnergyOne

Brant,
 EnergyOne has responded to the requested changes.  They agree to the 
revision of the MAC language but threw in a money wrench by adding a warm and 
fuzzy triggering event  if a party refused to provide security within 48 
hours of a reasonable request therefore.  No standard is provided as to the 
reason for the request.    They also deleted the original Collateral 
Threshold language which was in their first draft.  Please respond to these 
matters to me and to Sylvia Pollan. 
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 09:47 AM -----

	Dan J Hyvl 05/21/2001 08:59 AM 	   To: Sylvia S Pollan/Enron@EnronXGate  cc:   
Subject: EnergyOne

Attached is a memo of the major items in their comments to our requested 
changes.  Let me know when you are ready to discuss.

 << File: 2001-035memo.doc >>