Message-ID: <24187454.1075858947920.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT) From: tana.jones@enron.com To: patrick.mulvany@enron.com, diane.anderson@enron.com Subject: FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jones, Tana X-To: Mulvany, Patrick , Anderson, Diane X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \TJONES (Non-Privileged)\Jones, Tana\Sent Items X-Origin: Jones-T X-FileName: TJONES (Non-Privileged).pst I also got an email back from Bill Bradford, head of Credit that siad this doesn't make sense. Maybe you need to prepare a print out of the trades and send to debbie, me & bill. -----Original Message----- From: Brackett, Debbie R. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:28 AM To: Jones, Tana Subject: RE: Riskmantra vs. EGM No idea. EGM doesn't exist. -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Tana Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:42 PM To: Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.; Campbell, Lesli; Conwell, Wendy; Espinoza, Veronica; Johnson, Rudwell; Lebrocq, Wendi; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Ngo, Tracy; Radous, Paul; Rohauer, Tanya; Sacks, Edward; Vanek, Darren; Williams, Jason R (Credit) Cc: Mulvany, Patrick Subject: FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM Does anyone in Credit know the answer to this question, as I don't? -----Original Message----- From: Mulvany, Patrick Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:52 PM To: Jones, Tana Cc: Anderson, Diane Subject: FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM Tana, I was just following about these trades. -----Original Message----- From: Mulvany, Patrick Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:36 PM To: Jones, Tana Cc: Anderson, Diane Subject: Riskmantra vs. EGM Tana, There are about 20-30 deals in pending sent to legal status that are Riskmantra vs. EGM. My question is should we even be doing trades with Enron Gas Marketing. And if we should, can we set up an ISDA with RMT with an effective date of 9/5/01? Thanks, Patrick