Message-ID: <4254075.1075856566608.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:46:00 -0700 (PDT) From: qkerr@maths.uq.edu.au To: vkamins@enron.com Subject: message 4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "qkerr" X-To: "Vincent Kaminski" X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_5\Notes Folders\Australia X-Origin: Kaminski-V X-FileName: vkamins.nsf Dear Dr. Kaminski, This is a message of discussing the problem in Lacima's paper. I think that Glen Dixon has told you there is a fault in the paper written by Dr. Clewlow and Dr. Strickland. It is understandable to have some errors in their work. People always make mistakes. Actually, I found the problem in appendix A of their paper. They can't prove the eq. A4 rigorously. There is something wrong in mathematical interpretation. If you like, I can give you a full analysis of this problem. PS: attached with their paper. best regard Quentin --------------------------------- Quentin Kerr, email: qkerr@maths.uq.edu.au Room: 67-622 Tel: (07)33461428 Department of Mathematics, The University of Queensland - energy_single_factor.zip