Message-ID: <25784162.1075857032585.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 05:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: zimin.lu@enron.com
To: kenneth.shulklapper@enron.com
Subject: Re: The transportion model worked
Cc: stinson.gibner@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: stinson.gibner@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com
X-From: Zimin Lu
X-To: Kenneth Shulklapper
X-cc: Stinson Gibner, Vince J Kaminski
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_9\Notes Folders\C:\Technote\Mail\Projects
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

Great to hear that.  You are right, we should include Rho (done) and Theta 
(to do) for the cost term.

Zimin


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Kenneth Shulklapper                           04/26/2000 12:07 PM
	

To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: It worked

Zimin,

the model worked well today.  Hopefully it will continue the same in the 
future.

Do we need to make a similar change in the model to "Drift" to account for 
changes on the Demand Charges over time?

Ken