Message-ID: <9169654.1075846204966.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:13:00 -0700 (PDT) From: robert.hemstock@enron.com To: richard.sanders@enron.com, jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, mark.haedicke@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, aleck.dadson@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, tmclaren@gpc.ca, awm@blakes.com, glf@blakes.com, dwm@blakes.com Subject: Project Stanley - Alberta Market Surveillance Regulation Changes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Robert Hemstock X-To: Richard B Sanders, Jeffrey T Hodge, Mark E Haedicke, Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro, Aleck Dadson, Mark Palmer, tmclaren@gpc.ca, awm@blakes.com, glf@blakes.com, dwm@blakes.com X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Antitrust X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf You may be interested to know that on July 20, 2000 the Alberta Minister of Resource Development signed the new Market Surveillance Amendment Regulation into law. The new regulation made four changes to the existing Market Surveillance Regulation, namely: (a) it gave the MSA the new authority to monitor the conduct of the PPA Owners in relation to compliance with their obligations under the PPAs; (b) it gave complaintants a mechanism to appeal a decision of the MSA not to further investigate a complaint to the Power Pool Council; (c) it retained the mandatory referral mechanism by the MSA to another agency if the MSA's investigation determines the matter falls within another agency's jurisdiction (i.e. Competition Bureau) but has eliminated the requirement that upon such a referral the MSA cease its own investigation. The Power Pool Council now has the authority to determine whether the MSA should carry on with its investigation after a referral, or not. (d) it added a section relating to the MSA's authority to apply to the Court for an order authorizing it to take evidence outside of Alberta. Attached is a copy of the Market Surveillance Amendment Regulation.