Message-ID: <855817.1075851029352.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:55:00 -0700 (PDT) From: james.steffes@enron.com To: steven.kean@enron.com Subject: Re: Dabhol Reg Risk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: James D Steffes X-To: Steven J Kean X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Oct2001_2\Notes Folders\Attachments X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf FYI. Jane is doing a great job supporting the Reg Risk efforts. JDS ---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 06/02/2000 07:55 AM --------------------------- Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 06/02/2000 01:10 PM To: John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: James D Steffes@EES Subject: Re: Dabhol Reg Risk Just had a preview meeting with Wade Cline and Neil McGregor (Pres. of DPC). They are very supportive of the effort and felt that, while "Jane, you always bring us such good news!" that the depth of analysis and real time concerns articulated was an excellent thing for the company. In fact, they wanted a few more mitigants put in and then shot down, anticipating Jeff Skilling-type questions. Thus, this regulatory risk idea if done in depth for each region/project, may be a bigger service for Enron than you guys had ever anticipated. They also thought of one more tack to take on the renegotiation issue to figure out how far we could go. Good deal. (However, will still wear body armor/butt plate into the Sanjay meeting next Wednesday). ---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/02/2000 01:06 PM --------------------------- John Neslage 06/01/2000 08:03:35 AM To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: James D Steffes@EES Subject: Re: Dabhol Reg Risk Thank you for staying so on top of this, Jane. I really appreciate it. John Jane Wilson 06/01/2000 06:19 PM To: James D Steffes@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: Dabhol Reg Risk They're working on the numbers, but it will be ugly.