Message-ID: <4829913.1075851049963.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 02:42:00 -0800 (PST)
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: sarah.novosel@enron.com
Subject: Re: SEC timing
Cc: paul.kaufman@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: paul.kaufman@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
X-From: Steven J Kean
X-To: Sarah Novosel
X-cc: Paul Kaufman, Richard Shapiro
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Oct2001_2\Notes Folders\Attachments
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

Question:  why do we need from jan 8 to jan 31 to respond to staff comments?  
I think we should squeeze that time dramatically to take a shot at Jan or 
early Feb resolution.  If there is slippage, I don't want our earliest target 
date to be the end of Feb.  



	Sarah Novosel
	12/18/2000 05:27 PM
		 
		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: SEC timing


----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 12/18/2000 06:27 PM -----

	"JOANNE RUTKOWSKI" <JRUTKOWS@LLGM.COM>
	12/18/2000 11:53 AM
		 
		 To: Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com, dlarson@enron.com, 
Mitchell.Taylor@enron.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com
		 cc: lola.weller@enron.com, Lysa.Akin@enron.com, rosario.boling@enron.com, 
Sarah.Novosel@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: SEC timing


Enclosed is a memo that's been vetted by Bill Weeden.

Best

Joanne

 - #189265 v1 - enron -jt memo re PGE timing.doc