Message-ID: <14135435.1075851001856.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 02:16:00 -0700 (PDT) From: robert.frank@enron.com To: vicki.sharp@enron.com, andrew.ralston@enron.com Subject: Fwd: FW: Fort Meade Privatization Cc: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, laren.tarbet@enron.com, bill.votaw@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com, john.carr@enron.com, scott.porter@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, laren.tarbet@enron.com, bill.votaw@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com, john.carr@enron.com, scott.porter@enron.com X-From: Robert Frank X-To: Vicki Sharp, Andrew Ralston X-cc: Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro, Laren Dean Tarbet, Bill Votaw, Peggy Mahoney, John Carr, Scott Porter X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Oct2001_2\Notes Folders\Attachments X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf Attached are the BGE filings at the US District Court in Baltimore. They are seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, both of which were summarily rejected by Judge Matsch in Denver, who is treating CSU's claim as an APA review. They are also making virtually identical legal claims as CSU - their central claim is that they have the exclusive right to operate electric and gas systems inside Fort Meade. BGE has also brought in the issue of state jurisdiction over other entities such as EFSI: they cite an opinion letter from the General Counsel of the MD PSC as an "official decision" - which it is not. In any case, Randy Rich and I had subsequent meeting with GC regarding that letter in which she "clarified" her position in various respects contrary to BGE's claims. But I see that aspect of BGE's complaint as favorable from our standpoint - the District Court can rule on this issue instead of the state courts. Vicki/Andrew, please let me know how you want to proceed. I have a few ideas that we could discuss with whomever handles the case as outside counsel. -Bob 3-3180 ---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Frank/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000 08:46 AM --------------------------- "Randall Rich" on 09/01/2000 08:34:47 AM To: cc: "Albert Krachman" , "Charles McNeish" Subject: Fwd: FW: Fort Meade Privatization The BGE peititon is attached. Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by bracepatt.com; Fri, 01 Sep 2000 08:27:05 -0500 Received: FROM smtp1.bge.com BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Fri Sep 01 08:28:46 2000 -0500 X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected Received: from ex-ge-r01.ge.cec (unverified) by smtp1.bge.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 09:18:07 -0400 Received: by smtp2.bge.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 09:25:26 -0400 Message-ID: <82D020D6E0D8D311BD830004AC4CF564010F4B66@ex-ge-m05.ge.cec> From: "Gahagan, Daniel P" Sender: "Hertsgaard, Heidi L" To: "'rrich@bracepatt.com'" Subject: FW: Fort Meade Privatization Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 09:25:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C01418.12A70440" * BGE-Army Cover letter to Clerk.doc > * BGE-Army Complaint.doc > * BGE-Army Memorandum for Preliminary Injunction.doc > * BGE-Army Memorandum Table of Contents.doc > * BGE-Army Motion for Preliminary Injunction.doc > * BGE-Army Declaration of M. Bay.doc > > I have also attached the GAO decision. > > <> <> > <> < Memorandum Table of Contents Authorities.DOC>> < Preliminary Injunction.DOC>> <> > <> > > Please forward these documents to Susan Miller. > > Thanks. > > Monika - BGE-Army Cover letter to Clerk.DOC - BGE-Army Complaint.DOC - BGE-Army Memorandum for Preliminary Injunction.DOC - BGE-Army Memorandum Table of Contents Authorities.DOC - BGE-Army Motion for Preliminary Injunction.DOC - BGE-Army Declaration of M. Bay.DOC - GAO Decision Case No 285209 080200.pdf