Message-ID: <24145274.1075851017196.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:46:00 -0700 (PDT) From: susan.mara@enron.com To: robert.williams@enron.com Subject: AReM/WPTF Comments on Draft Decisions Regarding PX Credit and Direct Access Cc: steven.kean@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: steven.kean@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com X-From: Susan J Mara X-To: Robert C Williams X-cc: Steven J Kean, Jeff Dasovich, James D Steffes, Harry Kingerski, Vicki Sharp, Wanda Curry, Paul Kaufman X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Oct2001_2\Notes Folders\Attachments X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf Dan Douglass has drafted joint comments for two coalitions in which Enron is a member -- Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and Western Power Trading Forum. Robert, feel free to contact Dan directly with your comments. Let me know your thoughts as well. I am out of the office at a WPTF meeting. Dan is here as well. If you need to contact me, you can leave me a message on my office phone or try my cell (415 -- 902-4108), but I'm not sure the cell is working all the time. Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 ----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 07:35 AM ----- "Dan Douglass" 06/20/2001 10:59 PM To: "ARM" cc: Subject: Comments on Draft Decisions Regarding PX Credit and Direct Access Attached for your review and comment is my first draft of comments to be filed on Monday with regard to the draft decisions of ALJ Barnett and Commissioner Bilas.? Please review it carefully, as I have thrown in everything I can think of on a rush basis, and it may require some significant editing.? Pay particular attention to Section V dealing with Bilas' request for parties to discuss alternatives to DA suspension.? The draft offers a compromise to the DWR's concerns, as expressed in the Angelides memo.? Also, notice that Section VI urges the Commission to bifurcate the DA and PX credit issues, acting quickly on the first, if it must, but more leisurely on the PX credit subject. ? Finally, I have a suggestion?in the form of a question.? How would AReM members feel about making this a joint filing with WPTF?? There is cross-membership between the two groups and the same issues would be raised in the separate filings which I am otherwise prepared to draft.? This draft would requires some modifications so as to refer to the "Joint Parties" as opposed to solely mentioning AReM, and I might? add a section dealing more explicitly with WPTF's contribution to getting the zero minimum bill stipulation signed in the first place.? Otherwise, the document would stay much as it is (subject to your input over the next few days, of course).? Please let me know what you think asap, as I am already working on a WPTF draft.? Incidentally, I will also be filing comments on behalf of ABAG which will support the positions taken in the attached document, but I am not proposing that ABAG also be a party to this filing.? Thanks for your help!? Comments as soon as possible would be very much appreciated! ? Dan ? ? Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.? Suite 244 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Tel:?? (818) 596-2201 Fax:? (818) 346-6502 douglass@energyattorney.com ? - Blank Bkgrd.gif - 6-25-01 AReM Comments - Draft 1.doc