Message-ID: <14938847.1075848114124.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 06:27:00 -0800 (PST)
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: elizabeth.linnell@enron.com
Subject: Reg affairs 2001 budget
Cc: david.delainey@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: david.delainey@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
X-From: Steven J Kean
X-To: Elizabeth Linnell
X-cc: David W Delainey, Richard Shapiro
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_June2001_4\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

Eliz -- does this allocation reflect the cuts we have already made?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/12/2000 02:25 PM -----

	David W Delainey@ECT
	11/10/2000 01:04 PM
		 
		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Wes 
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Reg affairs 2001 budget

Steve, I noticed that our allocation from 2000 to 2001 is going up by 21% 
year on year (ie) $13.9M from $11.5M.  We have been able to keep ENA's direct 
group expenses flat year on year, we are trying hard to keep the corporate 
allocation flat year to year as well.  Do you have a view on how we might be 
able to achieve this goal?

Regards
Delainey