Message-ID: <32851489.1075848247837.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: cindy.olson@enron.com
Subject: Re: part time/reduced hour employees
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steven J Kean
X-To: Cindy Olson
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_June2001_5\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

ok




Cindy Olson
05/08/2001 11:48 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: part time/reduced hour employees

Steve, I think we have consensus on how we would like the part ttime people 
handled in the PRS process for mid year.....okay.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron on 05/08/2001 
11:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Gina Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/06/2001 04:10 PM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate 

Subject: part time/reduced hour employees



Cindy I chatted with Elyse (Elizabeth Labanowski never returned my calls or 
messages) on the pt/rh issue.   Elyse is in favor of having the pt/rh 
employees in the regular PRC process, with education for managers and at 
facilitator training and a statement in the ground rules to ensure that they 
are not penalized or otherwise disadvantaged by the process.  

David and I discussed this option which he is in favor of it as well.  In the 
meantime for year end we will be ready with a system change to allow us to 
see pt/rh employees on the screen segregated from the full timers- and to 
have a live chart of pt/rh employees as well as the full timers.  We can't do 
that for mid-year because it requires a good deal of programming, but it is a 
feature we can incorporate at year end.  

what do you think?

Gina