Message-ID: <1805591.1075840891049.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:54:00 -0700 (PDT) From: christopher.calger@enron.com To: louise.kitchen@enron.com Subject: Goldendale - NEPCO EPC, GE 7FA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Christopher F Calger X-To: Louise Kitchen X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Kitchen, Louise\'Americas\Portland X-Origin: KITCHEN-L X-FileName: louise kitchen 2-7-02.pst Louise, Just a heads up on an opportunity you might hear about: - NEPCO has an EPC contract with a small IPP for a 245MW combined cycle project in Goldendale, WA, adjacent to an aluminum smelter - NEPCO brought an EECC turbine to the project as part of the EPC contract - The developer's financing fell through 3 weeks ago (they attempted a highly structured muni-bond financing with tolls for marketers and the smelter) - NEPCO has been paid several million $ for engineering services, but construction wont start until a big payment ($30MM+) is made April 18 - When the financing fell through they called the big generators to see who would step up - Reliant was the most agressive, but last week Reliant changed their bid - instead of paying up-front they will pay at COD subject to high delay damages - The developer appears to be in a bad box - NEPCO called us last week - the developer would like Enron to provide construction financing - I sent in a SWAT team to check out the project - In general, we like it, but I am not interested in lending $ to other people, so I am figuring out if we could just buy it. It is approx $200MM to construct but its early time to market may make it economic Three things could happen here: 1) Someone else buys it and NEPCO continues with their EPC contract 2) Enron buys the project from the developer, constructs and flips 3) Project dies altogether - in this case we want to make sure ENA gets the turbine - Janet and I wanted it last year; now Duran, Jacoby and I still want it. I will keep you posted. Regards, Chris