Subject: FW: CPUC - CA
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:55:45 -0800 (PST)

another one to delainey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard  
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:47 AM
To:	Leff, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Dasovich, Jeff; Delainey, David W.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike D.
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: CPUC - CA

Dan: Relative to support of California issues for "EES/OLDCO", once Jim and his group begin supporting  NETCO, there will be staff remaining (clearly, staffing will be tight, and it's still my hope that Jim decides to stay with "OLDCO/NEWCO) in regulatory affairs (5 professionals including myself) to support you and others on California as well as all other issues for "EES/OLDCO as well as NEWCO....Thanks...Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leff, Dan  
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:36 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Dasovich, Jeff; Shapiro, Richard; Delainey, David W.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	CPUC - CA

Jim - 

Following up on our discussion.......

Thank you for taking the lead to prep and set up a meeting(s) to get the appropriate team(s) prepared to testify on January 24, 2002.

I realize that there will be many different activities underway in the next couple of weeks, and we all include maintaining / maximizing the value of the CA book and the CPUC activities as critically important.

Thanks - Dan