Message-ID: <7929692.1075857687550.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:47:00 -0800 (PST)
From: john.lavorato@enron.com
To: kevin.presto@enron.com
Subject: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: John J Lavorato
X-To: Presto, Kevin </o=ENRON/ou=NA/cn=Recipients/cn=Notesaddr/cn=cbb04d6a-1246fcea-862564ad-678fa4>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \jlavora\Sent Items
X-Origin: Lavorado-J
X-FileName: jlavora.pst

The following points refer to the methodology that we are taking to rebook the New Albany Plant.  Please send me a note immediately if you disagree.
Assume that NewAlb is a non mark to market entity and Enron is the mark to market entity.  However, it is fully owned and operated by us for now.


*  The power mark to market book will pay NewAlb a capacity payment of $4.87 for 5 years.  We shaped this payment as follows:

2001 - $5.06
2002 - $4.96
2003 - $4.86
2004 - $4.75
2005 - $4.65

*  This payments allows Enron to supply gas to NewAlb and receive power. 

*  Enron will pay NewAlb $1000 per unit start.

*  Enron will also pay NewAlb $2.00/MW hour for varialbe o&m.

*  This will create an entity "NewAlb" that will return 9% assuming a book value of $336/kw on 12/31/2005 vs. 409 currently.

*  If NewAlb pays the 9% out that entity should be relatively flat each year for the next five.