Message-ID: <2728441.1075857692303.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:09:51 -0800 (PST) From: lavorato@enron.com To: colleen.sullivan@enron.com Subject: RE: El Paso transport Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Lavorato, John X-To: Sullivan, Colleen X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \jlavora\Sent Items X-Origin: Lavorado-J X-FileName: jlavora.pst It's more related to the size of this transaction and the fact that the transport model apparently doesn't calc var. I have no fundamental concerns but this one hit me from left field. On our other issue, I working on getting something in front of you this week. -----Original Message----- From: Sullivan, Colleen Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 9:13 AM To: Lavorato, John Subject: El Paso transport I understand that there was a new EPNG transport booked yesterday but that you did not want any option value booked. Could you let me know your thoughts on this? Is this a revenue management issue or do you still have fundamental concerns with the option value concept?