Message-ID: <12375152.1075857695562.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:20:41 -0700 (PDT) From: lavorato@enron.com To: greg.whalley@enron.com Subject: FW: Project Slapshot Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Lavorato, John X-To: Whalley, Greg X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \jlavora\Sent Items X-Origin: Lavorado-J X-FileName: jlavora.pst They are working quite a complex tax structure in Canada. I'm not sure wha= t role I should play. Should I just assume that they know what they are do= ing and let them do whatever they want sort of like the finance guys do wit= h our balance sheet or should I get involved. My first take was that this = was way too good to be true. John -----Original Message----- From: =09Douglas, Stephen H. =20 Sent:=09Wednesday, May 23, 2001 6:29 PM To:=09Lavorato, John Subject:=09Project Slapshot Just to follow up from our meeting yesterday morning, the total present val= ue benefit from Project Slapshot is approximately $100 million (we do not a= t this point know the exact benefit because it is dependent on the yet unde= termined interest rate to be charged in connection with the EIM financing).= The benefit will be realized by EIM Canada and Enron Canada Corp. through= a reduction in the amount of taxes paid by each company. The risk related= to the transaction is that the interest deductions from the transaction ar= e denied in part and, as to the part denied, EIM Canada and Enron Canada Co= rp. are required to pay interest to Revenue Canada on the amount of income = offset by such denied interest deduction. I will forward to you a calculat= ion of the potential interest charge to Enron Canada Corp. in this circumst= ance as soon as I confirm with our Canadian counsel the method by which suc= h interest charge is calculated, and the likely rate at which it would be i= mposed. A more remote risk (due to actions we are taking in the financing = documents) stemming from the transaction is that Revenue Canada could asser= t a withholding tax on interest payments made by EIM Canada to the lender i= n the transaction. This risk would fall on EIM Canada. I believe that it = is highly unlikely that either risk will ever be realized and have obtained= the highest level of comfort on this point possible from our Canadian coun= sel absent their telling us that there is no risk (specifically, Blake, Cas= sels believes that there is a 70 to 80 percent likelihood that our position= will be sustained if challenged). I am attending the Enron Tax Conference= on Thursday and Friday of this week but can be reached at 713.817.5052 sho= uld you have questions regarding this transaction. Best regards. SHD.