Message-ID: <12206197.1075862011083.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:59:18 -0800 (PST) From: matthew.lenhart@enron.com To: hal.lenhart@apollogrp.edu Subject: RE: Golden Parachute Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Lenhart, Matthew X-To: 'Hal Lenhart @ENRON' X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MLENHAR (Non-Privileged)\Lenhart, Matthew\Sent Items X-Origin: Lenhart-M X-FileName: MLENHAR (Non-Privileged).pst they did talk to the trading floor yesterday and everyone was upset. the only thing i can say for him is that at least he has hung around and stood in the fire. skilling and fastow bolted. i have no respect for them. i guess his golden parachutte was in place since 89, but that was a situation in which the company is trading at 80 and we are taken over at 110. not 90 down to 10. -----Original Message----- From: Hal Lenhart @ENRON Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:02 PM To: Lenhart, Matthew Subject: Golden Parachute I read in the WSJ that Lay is foregoing his $60.2 million parachute. How thoughtful! The article said that considerable pressure was exerted by the trading department. Were you in on any of it? Hooray for the trading department. Lay took a chunk out of Enron over the years. Can the trading department go after Skilling and Fastow?