Message-ID: <19642493.1075855013387.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:36:32 -0800 (PST)
From: corny_boersma@cargill.com
To: michelle.lokay@enron.com
Subject: RE: Transwestern Transport Proposal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Corny_Boersma@cargill.com@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-Corny+5FBoersma+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: Lokay, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MLOKAY>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MLOKAY (Non-Privileged)\TW-Commercial Group
X-Origin: Lokay-M
X-FileName: MLOKAY (Non-Privileged).pst

Thank you,
If we would rather not participate in Transwestern's 50/50 sharing
mechanism; if we were to re-market the capacity, I'm assuming that this
would be ok with you?  I don't think we would need this option.

Corny

-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle.Lokay@enron.com [mailto:Michelle.Lokay@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 3:28 PM
To: boersma, corny /hdqt
Subject: FW: Transwestern Transport Proposal


> Written confirmation of phone conversation concerning offer for firm
> transport to PG&E Topock.
> *	Effective date, to start ASAP
> *	Ending date, to coincide with existing transport to North Star
> Steel at Kingman, AZ...04/30/2008
> *	Primary receipt at NSS (#500383) to primary delivery at Topock
> (#56698)
> *	Volume, based on current available capacity of 2000 MMBtu/day on
> Topock lateral
> *	Rate, maximum demand from Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, with
> applicable commodity, fuel, and surcharges
> *	Shipper retains Right of First Refusal
>
> Please call me with additional questions.