Message-ID: <19642493.1075855013387.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:36:32 -0800 (PST) From: corny_boersma@cargill.com To: michelle.lokay@enron.com Subject: RE: Transwestern Transport Proposal Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Corny_Boersma@cargill.com@ENRON X-To: Lokay, Michelle X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MLOKAY (Non-Privileged)\TW-Commercial Group X-Origin: Lokay-M X-FileName: MLOKAY (Non-Privileged).pst Thank you, If we would rather not participate in Transwestern's 50/50 sharing mechanism; if we were to re-market the capacity, I'm assuming that this would be ok with you? I don't think we would need this option. Corny -----Original Message----- From: Michelle.Lokay@enron.com [mailto:Michelle.Lokay@enron.com] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 3:28 PM To: boersma, corny /hdqt Subject: FW: Transwestern Transport Proposal > Written confirmation of phone conversation concerning offer for firm > transport to PG&E Topock. > * Effective date, to start ASAP > * Ending date, to coincide with existing transport to North Star > Steel at Kingman, AZ...04/30/2008 > * Primary receipt at NSS (#500383) to primary delivery at Topock > (#56698) > * Volume, based on current available capacity of 2000 MMBtu/day on > Topock lateral > * Rate, maximum demand from Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, with > applicable commodity, fuel, and surcharges > * Shipper retains Right of First Refusal > > Please call me with additional questions.