Message-ID: <32785519.1075861149394.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:16:40 -0800 (PST) From: kelly.allen@enron.com To: stephen.veatch@enron.com, teb.lokey@enron.com Subject: FW: San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Allen, Kelly X-To: Veatch, Stephen , Lokey, Teb X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Teb_Lokey_Mar2002\Lokey, Teb\Inbox X-Origin: Lokey-T X-FileName: tlokey (Non-Privileged).pst -----Original Message----- From: =09Campbell, Larry =20 Sent:=09Friday, January 18, 2002 3:08 PM To:=09Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Chanley, Earl; Lindberg, Lorraine Cc:=09Roensch, David; Spalding, Norm; Allen, Kelly; Shafer, John; Kendrick,= William Subject:=09RE: San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume Guys from the environmental side, this looks like a no brainer, if all we a= re goning to do is add a cooler and no horsepower. Because this will be an= increase in capacity it will probably be a 7C project by FERC and require = an environmental report to be prepared. The only glitch I see is the noise= survey and possibly some abatement or modifications to the cooler to reduc= e the post construction noise levels. It would also be helpful to know whic= h facility we are talking about....... -----Original Message----- From: =09Eisenstein, Arnold L. =20 Sent:=09Friday, January 18, 2002 12:32 PM To:=09Chanley, Earl Cc:=09Roensch, David; Spalding, Norm; Campbell, Larry; Allen, Kelly Subject:=09FW: San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume Importance:=09High Don't know if you have seen this.....but it looks like it is a hot one. De= pending on how the FERC filing was left and how the air permits are current= ly configured, this may not need any approvals. Earl, are you in the lead = on this or is Power Systems like on Station 1?? Arnold -----Original Message----- From: =09Harris, Steven =20 Sent:=09Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:56 PM To:=09Matthews, Ron; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Asante, Ben; Alt= ers, Dennis; Keller, John R. Cc:=09Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Centilli, James Subject:=09RE: San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume I would like to pursue as quickly as possible the option of adding the cool= ers to get the incremental 10,000/d. Please proceed with developing a more = exact cost estimate and determining from a materials standpoint what the t= iming of the project might be. Thanks. =09Steve -----Original Message----- From: =09Matthews, Ron =20 Sent:=09Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:42 PM To:=09Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Asante, Ben; Al= ters, Dennis; Keller, John R. Cc:=09Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Centilli, James Subject:=09San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume Marketing requested Planning to review any and all possibilities to achieve= small volume expansions through the San Juan lateral. Several facility sc= enarios were investigated by Planning which are in the attached Excel sprea= dsheet. Most if not all are too costly to justify installing. However, th= ere is another option that is not listed in the attached that was a late en= try. Discussions with Engineering have determined that by cooling the inle= t air to the turbines would increase the available horsepower. That in tur= n would increase the station's overall throughput. Preliminary studies ind= icate that approximately 10 MMcf/d of additional throughput could be realiz= ed if inlet air cooling is installed. The + 30% estimate for two units wou= ld be $600,000. BIG bargain compared to the options in the attached file. = The facility installation is not a major job but the FERC approval to util= ize additional horsepower could take 6 - 9 months. Other considerations to= review would be the air quality permit for the increase in horsepower, and= potential environmental clearances to do construction. Let me know what y= ou think about this suggestion. Please feel free to call. Ron Matthews << File: SJLEXP01.XLS >>