Message-ID: <5623238.1075855089573.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 05:39:18 -0700 (PDT) From: m..love@enron.com To: edward.brady@enron.com, jad.doan@enron.com, stephanie.hopkins@enron.com, sladana-anna.kulic@enron.com, bruce.mills@enron.com Subject: FW: We found more physical index deals booked incorrectly by EOL, today Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Love, Phillip M. X-To: Brady, Edward , Doan, Jad , Hopkins, Stephanie , Kulic, Sladana-Anna , Mills, Bruce X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \PLOVE (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: Love-P X-FileName: PLOVE (Non-Privileged).pst FYI - keep an eye out for this. PL -----Original Message----- From: Bike, Anne Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:04 PM To: Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D. Subject: We found more physical index deals booked incorrectly by EOL, today Guys: Just a reminder to have everyone check their physical Index deals carefully. We have been discussing this issue with Tara and thought that it was a one time issue that had been resolved, but today, Tuesday, we found that EOL is still booking certain Fiz Index deals incorrectly. Look for a 0.00 in Basis. On most of ours the deals did not show up in any of our calcs because the Nymex reference is not populated.