Message-ID: <30286470.1075845785250.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 05:57:00 -0800 (PST) From: scott.healy@enron.com To: stephen.plauche@enron.com, michael.nanny@enron.com, terri.austin@enron.com Subject: Exhibit C Cc: jeffery.ader@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, robert.virgo@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: jeffery.ader@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, robert.virgo@enron.com X-From: Scott Healy X-To: Stephen Plauche, Michael D Nanny, Terri Austin X-cc: Jeffery Ader, Kay Mann, Robert P Virgo X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf For everyone's benefit, here is how the P.O. is going to work with respect to specifications. At P.O. execution, conceptual specifications ( believe that you all have these specs) will be attached to the P.O. Those specifications will be subject to change, except the items listed in Exhibit C (Fixed Specifications) which will not be subject to change. In the P.O., there will be an initial permitting period during which, we can cancel the P.O. at no cost if FCE does make additions to Exhibit C as needed to lock in the permit filings (we will also propose changes to the Performance Standards if we reasonably believe that we can not permit the Performance Standards set forth in the P.O.). Also, attached to the P.O. will be a typical unit site layout. On this layout, it will identify our various points of interconnection between our scope of work and FCE's. These interconnection points will be contractually fixed and not subject to change. During our permitting effort, we will provide FCE will a site layout for each facility (using the standard unit layout). FCE will only approve the layout as to access. Eight months after release of the order, FCE will provide us with the engineering drawings used to bid out FCE's scope of work. We will have two weeks to review and approve. Twelve months after release of the order, FCE will provide us with the final specs which will be based on the engineering drawings. I need you all to do the following: 1. Review the conceptual specifications 2. Review Exhibit C (below) 3. Give me any conditions or constraints (in language) that we would like to govern the process of going from the Preliminary Specifications to the Engineering Drawings to the Final Specifications 4. Any remaining comments on the Acceptance Test Protocal ---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Healy/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:34 PM --------------------------- "Leo, Tony" on 11/10/2000 06:12:16 PM To: "'Scott.Healy@enron.com'" cc: Subject: Exhibit C > -----Original Message----- > From: Leo, Tony > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:11 PM > To: 'Stephen.Plauche@enron.com'; Bentley, Chris; Nock, Herb; Leitman, > Jerry; Levine, Ross; 'Jacqueline Scheib' > Cc: 'Michael.D.Nanny@enron.com'; 'Terri.Austin@enron.com' > Subject: Exhibit C > > Exhibit C of the contract, Fixed Specifications is attached, along with > the figure attachment. Let me know if anyone wants to retitle the figure > or rework any of the language. > > Tony > <> <> - Exhibit C.doc - Attachment to Exhibit C.tif