Message-ID: <9968339.1075845787927.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:17:00 -0800 (PST) From: stephen.plauche@enron.com To: kay.mann@enron.com Subject: New Exhibit C Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Stephen Plauche X-To: Kay Mann X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf FYI... SP ---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000 12:20 PM --------------------------- "Leo, Tony" on 11/27/2000 09:14:56 AM To: "'Stephen.Plauche@enron.com'" , "'Scott.Healy@enron.com'" , "'Terri.Austin@enron.com'" cc: "Levine, Ross" , "Skok, Andy" , "Bentley, Chris" , "Nock, Herb" Subject: FW: New Exhibit C Here is the latest version of exhibit C, the fixed spec, which now includes the correction factor discussion. I assumed that this was sent with the contract draft that Jackie sent to Kay later that day, but it apparently wasn't. Note that the message refers to a new draft of the test protocol, which is the one I sent out on 11/22/00. > -----Original Message----- > From: Leo, Tony > Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 8:10 PM > To: Levine, Ross > Cc: ''Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino' '; Bentley, Chris; Nock, Herb; > Leitman, Jerry > Subject: New Exhibit C > > Joe Debs and I had a conference call with the Enron tech folks Thursday > night to discuss their comments on our Test Protocol. We agreed to some > changes which I will issue a draft of early this week. During the call > they pointed out that the protocol refered to Performance Correction > factors, but that we had never established the Basis Points which those > correction factors are meant to adjust to. In other words the contract > needs a place where we state that performance is based on operation at sea > level, 60 degress, etc. We all agreed that the fixed spec (Exhibit C) was > a good place to put this. I went ahead and did that, and it also occurred > to me that this is also where our performance correction statements could > go. So the attached file is a new Exhibit C incorporating the site and > basis conditions, the correction factors, and Enron's comments on the old > short Exhibit C (delete the word "prefered" in the Stack Height section, > and delete the word "attached" in the reference to the interface drawing). > <> - Exhibit C Fixed Specs.doc