Message-ID: <551708.1075845797316.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 1979 16:00:00 -0800 (PST) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: toxley@winston.com Subject: Re: GE Release Cc: kay.mann@enron.com, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: kay.mann@enron.com, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: "Timothy Oxley" X-cc: , X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Here is the language which I previously requested from GE: Winston & Strawn has asked that the following be added to the Consents to Assignment (e.g., in the "Successors and Assigns" paragraph): "WestLB is an express third-party beneficiary of this Consent." "Timothy Oxley" on 12/14/2000 09:18:28 AM To: cc: Subject: Re: GE Release I have never seen the language requested before and have not signed off on it. Rob Taylor and I only discussed the concept because I had never seen a draft of the Consent until a signed copy was delivered to me yesterday. >>> 12/14/00 08:47AM >>> This language is different that what GE was told was requested before. I am more comfortable going back to GE with what was requested previously. Kay "Timothy Oxley" on 12/13/2000 08:38:52 PM To: cc: Subject: GE Release Pursuant to the request of Rose Engeldorf, the following is the suggested language for insertion into the GE Consent: "Each of GE Packaged Power and GE acknowledge that WestLB is a third party beneficiary of this Consent and shall be entitled to enforce its provisions against GE Packaged Power and GE, respectively, as if a party to this Consent."