Message-ID: <3013301.1075845851019.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 05:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: stuart.zisman@enron.com
Subject: RE: Tennessee tax issues (this should be a painless question)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Stuart Zisman
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

SZ,

What do you think?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001 12:02 
PM ---------------------------


Ben F Jacoby@ECT
05/11/2001 10:04 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: RE: Tennessee tax issues  

Janine:

I don't need Stokes & Bartholemew to serve as lobbyists - I need them to 
continue to serve as local counsel on a few projects we're continuing to work 
on. I've been using Johnny Hayes for lobbying matters.

Kay - do we need to do anything to keep Stokes on board as local counsel for 
our Haywood and Shelby projects?

Thanks,

Ben



Janine Migden@ENRON

05/10/2001 05:19 PM

To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: RE: Tennessee tax issues  

Our lobbyists are the same.  I will call you to discuss what you are working 
on.  There are some tax issues which could have a potential impact.
Janine



	Ben F Jacoby@ECT
	Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
	05/10/2001 04:29 PM
		
		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: 
		 Subject: RE: Tennessee tax issues

Thanks for the e-mail. Who is our lobbyist? I still have a need for Stokes & 
Bartholemew (Gif Thornton and Bill Bruce). Other that that, I think I'm 
covered. Please let me know the name of the lobbyist before terminating.

Thanks.

Ben