Message-ID: <30077745.1075845866660.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 03:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: reagan.rorschach@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com, david.fairley@enron.com
Subject: RE: Are we confusing scheduling services with QSE type stuff?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Reagan Rorschach
X-To: Kay Mann, David Fairley
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

That means it is recognized, not  "contemplated to be recognized", then?  I=
s=20
there such a thing as a recognized scheduling entity, or do you just schedu=
le=20
on their behalf? [Rorschach, Reagan]  SPP does not have such an entity at=
=20
this point.  However, everyone expects this to happen sometime soon.  If th=
is=20
is causing probelms or commitments on our part because this is not even in=
=20
existance, we should think about deleting reference to SPP rules and regs. =
=20
Once the scope of an SPP defined scheduling entity is proferred, we can=20
discuss any additional efforts required on our part to meet and be in=20
compliance with that scope.


From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 10:41 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: RE: Are we confusing scheduling services with QSE type stuff?


What about this?  Is this the QSE defn? [Rorschach, Reagan]  No, that would=
=20
be Qualified Scheduling Entity that has a very lengthly ERCOT definition. =
=20
This was greatly simplified to eliminate any confusion.  I think it is OK a=
s=20
is.=20

=01&Scheduling Entity=018 means an entity contemplated to be recognized by =
SPP, and=20
fully qualified under SPP rules and regulations, to schedule the transmissi=
on=20
of Energy, Capacity and Ancillary Services from the Facilities.


From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 07:51 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: RE: Are we confusing scheduling services with QSE type stuff?

Kay, lets couch it as below...or similar....what I did below is botchy.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay =20
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: Are we confusing scheduling services with QSE type stuff?

(20) If and when a new RTO begins operation, seek to  [Rorschach, Reagan] =
=20
comply with scheduling requirements and to satisfy [Rorschach, Reagan]  suc=
h=20
rules and protocols [Rorschach, Reagan] that are created in [Rorschach,=20
Reagan]  association therewith. =20