Message-ID: <1391209.1075845897030.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:38:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com To: kay.mann@enron.com Subject: RE: BGE CA (When are you coming back?) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kathleen Carnahan X-To: Kay Mann X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Kay. I suggest we: (i) change the choice of law from Maryland to New York; (ii) add an arbitration clause; and (iii) shorten the time from two years to one year. I am attaching a redline of these changes and one with these changes accepted. -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:42 PM To: Carnahan, Kathleen Subject: BGE CA Whatcha think? ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 06:41 PM --------------------------- From: Janelle Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 04:32 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: BGE CA Hi Kay! BGE is issuing an RFP, and they have drafted the attached CA.....Can you take a peek and see if it would be acceptable? http://supplier.bge.com/rfp/ca.doc Thanks! Janelle