Message-ID: <5138616.1075845903354.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: ben.jacoby@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: FW: Enron Pompano Developers Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Ben Jacoby
X-To: Kay Mann
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Kay:

I added some language to the intro of section 1 a that worked last time with 
Herman. Please disregard the earlier Pompano agreement. Let me know what you 
think.



 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben  
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:40 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: Enron Pompano Developers Agreement

Kay:

Attached are my changes to the Pompano Agreement. I reviewed the last version 
dated 4-19 which was approved internally (copy also attached), and made 
changes back to that draft where I felt appropriate.

The only section I did not add back in was the termination section. From a 
commercial perspective, I think we're better off leaving it out as we then 
have in effect a free option on the site (as a developers agreement is 
required to obtain building permits). 

Please let me know what you think.

Regards,

Ben