Message-ID: <23112521.1075845906379.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 00:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: herman.manis@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com, lisa.bills@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com
Subject: RE: LLC structure for power development
Cc: ben.jacoby@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: ben.jacoby@enron.com
X-From: Herman Manis
X-To: Kay Mann, Lisa Bills, Roseann Engeldorf
X-cc: Ben Jacoby
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Enron may have a land lease with Project Co.  In NO event may the land be 
burdened with low dollar hard costs/improvements - no materiality limits and 
no hard costs allowed.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay  
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Bills, Lisa; Engeldorf, Roseann; Manis, Herman
Cc: Jacoby, Ben
Subject: LLC structure for power development

Question for the team:

If it appears that we may have land which may not be able to stay off balance 
sheet, is it preferable to have the land held by a different LLC than the 
project LLC, with a lease to the E-Next/OBS compliant project co?  

If that is the case, what about the possibility of burdening the land with 
some low dollar hard costs?  I don't have anything in particular in mind, it 
is more of a theoretical question.

Thanks,

Kay