Message-ID: <25051025.1075845907025.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 08:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: Re: Fort Pierce
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kathleen Carnahan
X-To: Kay Mann
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

I'm getting ready to call her and find out what the poop is and when she will 
be ready.  




Kay Mann
05/22/2001 03:03 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Fort Pierce  

Did you tell her yes yes yes?


   
	
	
	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           05/22/2001 02:54 PM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Fort Pierce  

Yes.  How about this afternoon, 3:45 or 4:00.  I just got an email from my 
daughter, begging to come home for a month or so (it breaks my heart because 
I remember how lonely I was when I was pregnant in Louisiana).



Kay Mann
05/22/2001 02:43 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Fort Pierce  

okey dokey smokey

You want to take something to John Keffer today or tomorrow?

ckm


   
	
	
	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           05/22/2001 02:41 PM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Fort Pierce  

Of course not.  We really are only going to put the: (i) development 
documents (except the lease) and (ii) other publically available documents on 
deal bench (i.e. Interconnect Agreements, Feasibility Studies, etc.).

I only wanted you to have a heads up on what we had already provided TECO.  
Better to know was what I was thinking (even if it is after the fact).

K-



Kay Mann
05/22/2001 02:37 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Fort Pierce  

Anything posted on DealBench?