Message-ID: <19447407.1075845908616.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 06:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: ben.jacoby@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: Re: Blue Dog Max monthly report
Cc: chris.booth@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: chris.booth@enron.com
X-From: Ben Jacoby
X-To: Kay Mann
X-cc: Chris Booth
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

With respect to the payment of invoices, and the LC for the first unit, what 
do we need to do in light of Section 6(a) in the Letter Agreement? Let's talk 
about this in our meeting tomorrow.

Regards,

Ben




Kay Mann@ENRON
05/17/2001 08:40 AM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron 
Subject: Re: Blue Dog Max monthly report  

We aren't required to, but I don't see a downside to sending it.


   
	
	
	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/16/2001 08:07 PM
	

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann 

Subject: Re: Blue Dog Max monthly report  

I would think so. Please confer with Kay before we do.

Thanks,

Ben


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Chris Booth @ ENRON                           05/16/2001 04:07 PM
	

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Blue Dog Max monthly report

Ben,

Should we send this to Mike Young?

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001 04:06 
PM ---------------------------


jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com on 05/10/2001 02:55:58 PM
To: chris.booth@enron.com, matthew.tezyk@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: Blue Dog Max monthly report


 - Monthly Report 01-05-10.PDF