Message-ID: <23378144.1075845913670.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:39:00 -0700 (PDT) From: don.hammond@enron.com To: pthompson@akllp.com Subject: Re: LV Cogen/ABB Agreement Cc: kay.mann@enron.com, dale.rasmussen@enron.com, bill.williams@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: kay.mann@enron.com, dale.rasmussen@enron.com, bill.williams@enron.com X-From: Don Hammond X-To: "Thompson, Peter J." X-cc: Kay Mann, Dale Rasmussen, Bill Williams X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf I have gone through the Version 3 of the ABB agreement that you forwarded. I have compared it to the other versions and changes I was aware of (the technical areas only). I have attached a red-lined version with edits. Also, here are my notes on each of the changes: Section 5.1 of the Agreement - earlier versions of the Agreement contained the purchase amount here. As I commented by phone, by my calculation the total purchase amount for these two units would be $1,713,000.00, or $856,500.00 each. By my records, the original purchase amount for these units was $782,000.00. A change was made in November 2000 that increased each unit by $49,500.00. Another change in December 2000 increased each unit by $25,000.00. These increase amounts were confirmed by ABB on 11/28/00 and 12/18/00. The Version 3 document eliminates this purchase amount.. However, sections 6.1.2 and 6.1.3 contain amounts of $78,200.00, 10% on the original purchase amount of one unit. Should these values be changed? Exhibit B1: Section 5.1.2 b) and c) - these are revisions requested by the contractor. They are reasonable requests if they can be accommodated by ABB. I don not know if these changes were coordinated directly between the contractor and ABB. Section 9.1 - minimum ambient temperature Minimum ambient temperature should be minus 5 degrees C. This corresponds to 23 degrees F, the design basis temperature. The minus 13.3 degrees C requested by the contractor is incorrect. Section 9.5.5 - Surge Arrestor rating This is a new request from the contractor. It appears acceptable. Section 10 - Voltage Rating This is a correction to indicate a voltage of 138,000 Section 10 - Type of Cooling This is added information on type of cooling (FOA) as provided by ABB in thier revised data sheets. The other changes in Sections 9 and 10 correspond to information previously provided to ABB in conference calls and communications from the contractor.