Message-ID: <32933156.1075845943647.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, kathleen.clark@enron.com
Subject: Re: Change order for GE transformer--Pleasanton
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Ben Jacoby, Kathleen Clark
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

FYI.  I haven't read it yet, but thought I would pass it along anyway.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:23 
PM ---------------------------

	
	Don Hammond @ ECT
	
	10/11/2000
	
To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila 
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Re: Change order for GE transformer--Pleasanton  

Attached are files incorporating suggested revisions for the change order to 
Contract 24-LM6K-2-99 for the purchase of a generator step-up transformer for 
the Pleasanton Project.

In lieu of the Exhibit A of the draft you sent out, I have substituted 
Exhibit A, the GE proposal dated October 9, 2000.

I have substituted Exhibit B, GE's standard specifications for generator 
step-up transformers, for the EE&CC specifications in the earlier draft. GE's 
proposal is quoted on the basis of their standard GSU transformer 
specification. I have this only in hard copy and have a call into GE to 
verify this is the applicable standard and whether it is available in 
electronic form. I will give you a copy, Dale.

The two additional documents were transmitted along with GE's proposal and I 
have referenced them in Part I, Paragraph 2.