Message-ID: <32633838.1075845944490.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:58:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com Subject: Re: Revised letter of Sept 29 Cc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com, kathleen.clark@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com, kathleen.clark@enron.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com X-cc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com, Kathleen Clark X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Lee, Your changes to the letter look fine to me. I'm attaching the latest version I have on change order #2. Are we ready to go with this one? We would like to close out #3 and #4 soon. I believe GE prepared #4. Could you send me a copy of the latest draft of #4, as it was inadvertently deleted from my computer. Meanwhile, I'll work to get you a draft of #3. Thanks, Kay lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 10/13/2000 08:03:49 AM To: kay.mann@enron.com cc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com Subject: Revised letter of Sept 29 <> <> Kay, Attached is a redline version of Sept 29 letter, and clean copy for sign/send. The change involves reference to the contract paragraphs that deal with corrections, enabling Enron and GE to reach agreement on timing of performance of corrective work, if we both agreed to a schedule other than prior to delivery to site. We recognize that if any of this work has an impact on your EPC contractor's site work schedule, there maybe other consequences/remedies, as provided in the contract. I'll sign and fax. Hope you all have no objections. Thanks, Lee - SSlttrsept29rev1.doc - SSlttrsept29rev2.doc