Message-ID: <22421032.1075845945367.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: lisa.bills@enron.com
Subject: Re: Change order #2, PSCO
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Lisa Bills
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

I think the effective dates have been relating to when the deal was cut.  
That's as much a guess as anything.

Ben left me a voice mail that said he had gotten something from ESA on #3, 
but I haven't made it through all my emails to see if I have it. I will send 
it to you if I do, of course.

I would think #4 is ready as soon as I get confirmation that the dates are 
correct.  Again, I have to check my emails.

I heard a rumor about 5 (but am now drawing a blank), and haven't heard of 
any others.

Kay


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Lisa Bills                           10/17/2000 09:51 AM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Change order #2, PSCO  

Kay, from a general financing perspective the below looks fine.  For all 
these change orders, why do we keep having to make them effective long before 
they are actually executed?  I am concerned because for both WestLB and 
TurboPark, we need to provide the executed change orders to them on a timely 
basis.  Doesn't look so timely when we keep back dating documents.

I am very confused with Change Order Numbers also.  I received the executed 
Change Order 1.  Any idea where we are on 3, 4 and 5?  Any others on the 
horizon that you know of?

Regards, Lisa 


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Kay Mann                           10/16/2000 06:41 PM
	

To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben 
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, 
Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: Change order #2, PSCO

Is this ok with everybody?  It incorporates GE's latest comments.



Kay