Message-ID: <14076206.1075845947361.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 01:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: gloria.cruz@enron.com
Subject: Re: FuelCell contract questions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Gloria Cruz
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Please print and fax to me at 713 973 0287.  I'll forward a couple more I 
need faxed.  Thanks  Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/25/2000 08:38 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           10/25/2000 08:14 AM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: FuelCell contract questions  


1.  6 months is fine.  I think the standard should be higher on the 2.0 MW 
units.

2.  I would say that there should be a drawing for the foundation.  We should 
make the standard relative to the drawings either "substantially in 
accordance" or "not materially different."

3.  If termination is for a cause created by FuelCells.

4.  We should have a storage option if FuelCells is ahead of schedule on 
their deliveries.

5.  We should be able to assign to CRRA in all cases.  A financial standard 
for everyone else is fine.