Message-ID: <32311901.1075845953067.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 04:18:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Subject: RE: Facility Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: "Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

As I fix I was going to offer to let GE pick up 1/2 their bill....

Kay




"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 11/10/2000 12:15:45 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: RE: Facility Agreement

I was only joking!!  I appreciate their and your efforts

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:13 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Cc: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Subject: Re: Facility AGreement



I can assure you that no improvement in the relative risk allocation was
intended.  They pointed out what appeared to be some disconnects, and in
some cases I ok'd them putting the suggestions in for discussions purposes.
I wasn't trying to play games.

Talk to you soon,

Kay