Message-ID: <1187098.1075845954774.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 01:28:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: stuart.zisman@enron.com
Subject: Re: Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Stuart Zisman
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

You are right on all points (especially the punting one!).  You should have 
the list of specific "fill in the blank" stuff which I forwarded recently.  
Also, we had a discussion yesterday with GE on the form of the 
assignment/assumption agreement, so there shouldn't be anything required of 
you from that standpoint.  

I'm here today (wasn't yesterday) and will be happy to discuss it with you.

Kay


From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 11/16/2000 09:17 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC  

Kay,

I recognize that you would like to punt this "break out contract" thing as 
soon as possible; but, I would like to visit with you briefly about how any 
transition might work.  As I appreciate it, once the form of break out 
contract is complete, most of the hard work is done.  What types of 
modifications are envisioned for each of the break outs?  I assume that just 
a few things would change (for example (i) price, (ii) number of units, (iii) 
delivery points, and (iv) a pro rating of LD's).  Am I grossly 
underestimating the amount of work that will be required.  Please advise.

Stuart