Message-ID: <12802541.1075845957480.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:44:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: sheila.tweed@enron.com
Subject: Re: Turbine assignment clause
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Sheila Tweed
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Opps.  When you wrote back earlier I thought you were responding to me and 
not Rose's email, so I made a couple of changes and sent it out to 
everyone.    

The Barnas affiliate language required an affiliate to own or operate the 
plant (not construct), and I was unclear on the time frame when that had to 
occur.  I'll explain what happened and apologize to him if he thinks we 
re-traded, and can back off of the changes.

The insanity continues here. 

Kay




From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 11/28/2000 05:25 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: Turbine assignment clause  

I was pretty much Ok with Rose's changes but your thoughts are good too, 
although we spent a lot of time on the affiliate issue and I'm OK with an 
affiliate owning or consturcting the plant.  Please carry on in my absense.  
I've turned into a hostage and do not know when I may be permitted to return.