Message-ID: <5018337.1075845963520.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:57:00 -0800 (PST) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: jklauber@llgm.com Subject: Cc: heather.kroll@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: heather.kroll@enron.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: jklauber@llgm.com X-cc: Heather Kroll X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Hi John, I'm attaching the current draft of the contract under which we will be able to buy the Fuel Cell equipment for use on projects in Connecticut. The contract will likely be a Connecticut law contract. Could you have someone give it a fatal flaw check, or should I use Connecticut counsel? One issue which is nagging me is their request for a security interest in the equipment, as I think this might complicate financing. I assume that an equipment supplier has certain lien rights under Connecticut law anyway. Can you have this verified? I only want the simplest of explanations. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 06:52 AM --------------------------- "Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino" on 11/17/2000 10:26:09 PM To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" , "Jerry Leitman (E-mail)" , "Ross M. Levine (E-mail)" cc: "Sellay, William" Subject: <> <> -------------------------------------------------- Jacqueline Pennino Scheib, Esq. Robinson & Cole LLP 280 Trumbull Street Hartford, CT 06103 (p) 860-275-8285 (f) 860-275-8299 jscheib@rc.com - jgtk01!.DOC - RED FUELCELL AGR.DOC