Message-ID: <27493393.1075845968982.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 04:25:00 -0800 (PST) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: peterthompson@akllp.com Subject: RE: Sweetgum/ENA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kay Mann X-To: "Thompson, Peter J." X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf How about notices going to CA Development, "care of" this contact. CA doesn't have any employees. "Thompson, Peter J." on 12/21/2000 12:21:05 PM To: cc: "Cobb, Chris" Subject: RE: Sweetgum/ENA Shouldn't these be cc's under the Facility Agreement? Don't we want CA Development to also get copies of all notices? -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:14 PM To: Thompson, Peter J.; Cobb, Chris Subject: Re: Sweetgum/ENA otherwise known as CA Development I and CA Development II ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000 12:13 PM --------------------------- "George Kutzschbach" on 12/21/2000 12:00:13 PM To: Kay.Mann@enron.com cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com Subject: Re: Sweetgum/ENA Notice under the Facility Agreements should be as follows: Sweetgum Energy LP c/o InterGen North America LP 909 Fannin, Suite 2200 Houston, Texas 77010 Attention: John Jones Telephone: 713-374-3900 Facsimile: 713-374-3901 >>> 12/20/00 06:34PM >>> For the purposes of completing the facility agreement, we need the name/address of the contact person for invoices, etc. Thanks, kay