Message-ID: <20682851.1075845978195.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 08:50:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: thetherington@bracepatt.com
Subject: Re: Westinghouse 501d memo
Cc: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: "Thomas Hetherington" <thetherington@bracepatt.com>
X-cc: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Yes, this is issue is still around.

Thomas, I had some correspondence faxed to you today.  In it SW is clearly 
taking the position that the damage to the generator occured after delivery 
under the contract.  I thought you addressed that well in your memo, however, 
I have another question.  What impact does the use of DDP (Incoterms) have?  
Is it just one more part of the contract to be taken as a whole, or might it 
have some greater significance?  

Will the passage of ROL impact the LD claim?  I assume not, but I want a 
sanity check.

Thanks,

Kay




"Thomas Hetherington" <thetherington@bracepatt.com> on 12/19/2000 09:47:11 AM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com> 

Subject: Westinghouse 501d memo

Attached is a legal memo regarding Westinghouse's delivery obligations with 
respect to the 501D5A gas turbine generator package.  I will forward you an 
additional copy by fax.

TFAH  



