Message-ID: <8790801.1075845986103.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 23:10:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com
Subject: Re: Form of CA (Unilateral in favor of ENA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Kathleen Carnahan
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Let's discuss.


   
	
	
	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           02/14/2001 03:19 PM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Form of CA (Unilateral in favor of ENA)

Thanks for the quick response, my ass!  I forwarded this to him prior to his 
e-mail request!

Now,  I feel better.

K-
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 
03:22 PM ---------------------------


Rusty Stevens
02/14/2001 03:08 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Form of CA (Unilateral in favor of ENA)  

I just sent you a note on this.  Is this your's and Kay's favorite flavor of 
the day ?

Thanks for the quick response.


   
	
	
	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           02/14/2001 02:45 PM
	

To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Form of CA (Unilateral in favor of ENA)

Rusty,

Here is the form of CA we have used in connection with discussions regarding 
the sale of certain project entities and generation projects.