Message-ID: <15677156.1075845986524.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:41:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: PSEG - Exclusivity Letter & Comments
Cc: fred.mitro@enron.com, scott.healy@enron.com, rusty.stevens@enron.com, 
	carlos.sole@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: fred.mitro@enron.com, scott.healy@enron.com, rusty.stevens@enron.com, 
	carlos.sole@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Ben F Jacoby
X-cc: Fred Mitro, Scott Healy, Rusty Stevens, Carlos Sole
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Gentlemen,

I think we also need to be certain that we have a decent amount of discretion 
in whether we close, otherwise we have to consider the DASH process at this 
time.

Kay


   
	
	
	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/16/2001 01:12 AM
	

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carlos 
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: PSEG - Exclusivity Letter & Comments  

From a commercial perspective, I don't have a problem leaving out the 
exercise price during the 30 day option period, so long as our obligation to 
sell is contingent upon the negotiation of a purchase agreement and the 
agreement on purchase price. $300k seems fair for a 30 day exclusivity.

Regards,

Ben