Message-ID: <32512489.1075845993246.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: jklauber@llgm.com Subject: Fuel Cells Cc: heather.kroll@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: heather.kroll@enron.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: jklauber@llgm.com X-cc: Heather Kroll X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Hi John, I still need a Connecticut lawyer to look at this. Do you have someone available? I need input by Monday, March 19. Nothing comprehensive, just a fatal flaw analysis under Connecticut law. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 08:21 AM --------------------------- Kay Mann 12/11/2000 06:57 AM To: jklauber@llgm.com cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Hi John, I'm attaching the current draft of the contract under which we will be able to buy the Fuel Cell equipment for use on projects in Connecticut. The contract will likely be a Connecticut law contract. Could you have someone give it a fatal flaw check, or should I use Connecticut counsel? One issue which is nagging me is their request for a security interest in the equipment, as I think this might complicate financing. I assume that an equipment supplier has certain lien rights under Connecticut law anyway. Can you have this verified? I only want the simplest of explanations. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 06:52 AM --------------------------- "Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino" on 11/17/2000 10:26:09 PM To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" , "Jerry Leitman (E-mail)" , "Ross M. Levine (E-mail)" cc: "Sellay, William" Subject: <> <> -------------------------------------------------- Jacqueline Pennino Scheib, Esq. Robinson & Cole LLP 280 Trumbull Street Hartford, CT 06103 (p) 860-275-8285 (f) 860-275-8299 jscheib@rc.com - jgtk01!.DOC - RED FUELCELL AGR.DOC