Message-ID: <28229499.1075845993366.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 01:35:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: carlos.sole@enron.com, stephen.thome@enron.com, jake.thomas@enron.com
Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr
	oject
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Carlos Sole, Stephen Thome, Jake Thomas
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 09:35 
AM ---------------------------


lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 03/13/2001 08:47:21 AM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com, 
Bill.Williams@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: tconstan@llgm.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com 

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr 
oject


Bill/Dale-

Lee Moore pointed out what he thought was an inconsistency in the definition
of Heat Rate in 1.41, relative to the rest of the document for Peformance
Testing (Exhibit F) and the concept of guarantees based on Adjusted
Electrical Output and Adjusted Heat Rate.  As a result, we redlined the
definition of 1.41 to be sure all understood that Heat Rate calculations for
the purpose of the Performance test would based on Output measured at the
generator terminals net of Unit auxiliary loads as measured during the test.

Hope this helps your reach agreement on the EPC side of things.

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:26 PM
To: 'Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com'; Bill.Williams@enron.com;
Kay.Mann@enron.com
Cc: 'tconstan@llgm.com'; Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
project


Bill/Dale/Kay-

I've made redline edits with regards to LVCII performance guarantee values
in Section 10.7 for output and heat rate based on the Feb 8, 2001 guarantee
sheet.

Dale, please send revised LVC II facility agreement to reflect Units 25-28
with appropriate schedules for price, delivery, payment and termination
schedules at your earliest convenience.

The units 19-20 and 23-24 that are currently reflected in this document will
be left in E-Next (Turbopark).  The schedules for price, delivery, payment
will remain the same for these units.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); Bill.Williams@enron.com;
Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
project


Bill Williams asked me to forward the attached execution form of the
LM-6000 purchase contract.

The second attachment is to be inserted as Exhibit H-2 in the contract.  I
understand that we received it from GE, and that it is available only in
pdf format.

Thanks.

(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)(See attached file: LV Cogen Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC)


 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5_redline031201.DOC