Message-ID: <645585.1075846000584.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 04:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: carlos.sole@enron.com
Subject: Re: Your call
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Carlos Sole
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

I would think the policy would still be in place, but I don't remember what 
it is.


From: Carlos Sole on 04/02/2001 11:16 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Your call  

Rumor mill is working but you were the leak.  

On another point, on the PSEG deal, we're going to agree to a non-compete 
provision that limits the activities of ENA and it's affiliates with respect 
to the power project in Kendall county.  I recall that there was a policy 
requiring Mark Metts approval for such expanded non-competes.  Is that policy 
still in place?  I'll call after I get done with my PSEG call.