Message-ID: <15803539.1075846003905.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:42:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: stephen.thome@enron.com Subject: Re: Revised Salmon Agreement Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kay Mann X-To: Stephen Thome X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Does Bill know this? Lee is going to want to know that you guys are on the same page. Kay Stephen Thome@ECT 04/09/2001 07:19 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Revised Salmon Agreement Yes, the stabilizer definitely belongs in the contract. It has been included in our price to Delta. Kay Mann@ENRON 04/09/2001 05:02 PM To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement Steve, I know that we specifically included the stabilizer in the Salmon deal. Please confirm that it belongs there so that we can finish up the break out contract. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/09/2001 06:48 PM --------------------------- lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com cc: kay.mann@enron.com Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement Kent/Kay- I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount, Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount. The Power System Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill Williams advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not. That's consitent with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen). Regards, Lee <> - Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC