Message-ID: <7127927.1075846004048.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:37:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: bill.williams@enron.com Subject: Re: Revised Salmon Agreement Cc: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, don.hammond@enron.com, stephen.thome@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, don.hammond@enron.com, stephen.thome@enron.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: Bill Williams X-cc: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com@ECT, Don Hammond, Stephen Thome X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Sounds like both need to stabilizers. Kay From: Bill Williams @ ECT 04/09/2001 08:00 PM To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com cc: Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement Lee - I agree with your statement that LV needs the PSS. But not with regards to Delta. I do not know what Delta needs for siting their generation. It is my understanding that generators in the WSCC need PSS's. I am trying to locate chapter and verse on that requirement. It may be a size issue (ie - greater than "x" MWs of generator size). Don Hammond will help me locate the requirement in the morning, and I will get back to you. My concern was your e mails seemed to imply I said Delta doesn't need PSS. I want to stay silent on that issue. In any regard, Nevada Power Co requires PSS, that is the reason we are obtaining them for all the generators at LVCII. ---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams/PDX/ECT on 04/09/2001 06:02 PM --------------------------- Kay Mann@ENRON 04/09/2001 05:02 PM To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement Steve, I know that we specifically included the stabilizer in the Salmon deal. Please confirm that it belongs there so that we can finish up the break out contract. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/09/2001 06:48 PM --------------------------- lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com cc: kay.mann@enron.com Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement Kent/Kay- I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount, Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount. The Power System Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill Williams advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not. That's consitent with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen). Regards, Lee <> - Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC