Message-ID: <5412425.1075846005125.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: lee.johnson@ps.ge.com Subject: Re: Revised Salmon Agreement Cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: lee.johnson@ps.ge.com X-cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Me again. Here's the version I referenced in my earlier email. I believe we need to restore the stabilizer stuff, but I wanted to get agreement. Thanks, Kay lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com cc: kay.mann@enron.com Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement Kent/Kay- I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount, Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount. The Power System Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill Williams advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not. That's consitent with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen). Regards, Lee <> - Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC