Message-ID: <32214540.1075846007090.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 03:17:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: carlos.sole@enron.com Subject: Re: Westinghouse 501d memo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kay Mann X-To: Carlos Sole X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 10:17 AM --------------------------- Kay Mann 01/22/2001 04:50 PM To: "Thomas Hetherington" cc: Subject: Re: Westinghouse 501d memo Yes, this is issue is still around. Thomas, I had some correspondence faxed to you today. In it SW is clearly taking the position that the damage to the generator occured after delivery under the contract. I thought you addressed that well in your memo, however, I have another question. What impact does the use of DDP (Incoterms) have? Is it just one more part of the contract to be taken as a whole, or might it have some greater significance? Will the passage of ROL impact the LD claim? I assume not, but I want a sanity check. Thanks, Kay "Thomas Hetherington" on 12/19/2000 09:47:11 AM To: cc: Subject: Westinghouse 501d memo Attached is a legal memo regarding Westinghouse's delivery obligations with respect to the 501D5A gas turbine generator package. I will forward you an additional copy by fax. TFAH